Training & SOPs

21 CFR Part 11 §11.10(i) requires that personnel who use electronic record/electronic signature systems have appropriate education, training, and experience. EU Annex 11 §2 requires that training be provided for GMP-related computerized systems. This page provides training topic guidance and SOP templates to support your compliance program.

Note: These are recommended topics and templates. Your organization is responsible for developing, documenting, and maintaining its own training program and SOPs based on your specific regulatory requirements.

Training Requirements

Who Needs Training

RoleTraining ScopeWhen
All signersSigning ceremony, PIN management, signature meanings, audit trail awarenessBefore first use, and after significant updates
Reviewers / ApproversAll signer topics plus: approval workflow, separation of duties, rejection processBefore first approval, and after significant updates
AdministratorsAll topics plus: signature policies, safety classification, permission management, audit trail review, chain validation, GDPR erasure, exportBefore administering SealDoc, and after significant updates

Recommended Training Topics

  1. Signing ceremony walkthrough — demonstrate the full ceremony: select meaning, affirm identity (type name), enter PIN. Explain why each step is required (21 CFR Part 11 §11.200).
  2. PIN security — never share your PIN. Report suspected compromise immediately. Understand lockout (3 attempts, 15 minutes) and expiry (180 days default).
  3. Signature meanings — explain each meaning (Approved, Reviewed, Verified, Witnessed, Authored, Acknowledged) and when to use them.
  4. Approval workflow — Draft → In Review → Approved lifecycle. What happens when you submit, approve, or reject.
  5. Revert on edit — explain that editing a signed document revokes all signatures and requires re-approval.
  6. Separation of duties — the person who submits cannot be the sole approver. Explain person-level vs. department-level independence.
  7. Audit trail awareness — every action is logged and cannot be deleted. Users should understand that their actions are permanently recorded.
  8. Safety classification (if applicable) — explain the active scheme, what each level means, and how it affects approval requirements.

Training Records

Maintain records of who was trained, on what topics, when, and by whom. Training records should include:

  • Employee name and role
  • Training date
  • Topics covered
  • Trainer name
  • Assessment result (if applicable)
  • Next retraining date

Recommended SOPs

The following SOPs are recommended for organizations using SealDoc in regulated environments. Each section below provides the SOP scope, key steps, and references.

SOP 1: Electronic Signature Ceremony

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for electronically signing Jira issues and Confluence pages using SealDoc.
ScopeAll users who sign documents within regulated projects.
Key steps1. Open the document in Jira/Confluence. 2. Click "Sign" in the SealDoc panel. 3. Select the appropriate signature meaning. 4. Add a comment describing your review (optional but recommended). 5. Type your full name to affirm intent. 6. Enter your signing PIN. 7. Confirm the signature was recorded in the audit trail.
References21 CFR Part 11 §11.50, §11.100, §11.200(a)(1)

SOP 2: PIN Management

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for creating, maintaining, and protecting signing PINs.
ScopeAll users with signing permissions.
Key steps1. Create a 4-6 digit PIN that is not a trivially weak sequence. 2. Never share your PIN with anyone. 3. If you suspect your PIN has been compromised, report it to your administrator immediately and request a force-expire. 4. When your PIN expires (180 days default), create a new PIN that differs from the previous one. 5. If locked out after 3 failed attempts, wait 15 minutes before trying again.
References21 CFR Part 11 §11.200(a)(1), §11.300

SOP 3: Audit Trail Review

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for periodic review of the SealDoc audit trail.
ScopeAdministrators and quality managers.
Key steps1. Open SealDoc admin page or project page. 2. Navigate to the Audit Log tab. 3. Review entries for the period since last review. 4. Look for: unusual patterns (multiple failed PIN attempts, unexpected revocations, configuration changes by unauthorized users). 5. Run chain validation to verify integrity. 6. Document findings and any corrective actions. 7. Export the reviewed period as CSV/PDF for offline archival.
FrequencyAt minimum quarterly, or as required by your quality system.
References21 CFR Part 11 §11.10(e), EU Annex 11 §9

SOP 4: Chain Validation

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for verifying audit trail integrity using the chain validation tool.
ScopeAdministrators.
Key steps1. Open the SealDoc project page. 2. Click "Validate Chain". 3. Review results: all checks should pass (hash continuity, gap detection, HMAC verification, entry integrity). 4. If any check fails: do not attempt to fix the data. Document the failure, including the specific entry where the chain broke. Escalate to the quality manager and the SealDoc vendor. 5. Record the validation result and date.
FrequencyMonthly, or after any suspected data integrity incident.
ReferencesEU Annex 11 §7, §9

SOP 5: Safety Classification Changes

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for assigning or changing safety classification on documents.
ScopeUsers with signing permissions in projects that use safety classification.
Key steps1. Assess the risk level of the document according to your organization's risk assessment process. 2. Open the SealDoc panel and select the appropriate safety classification level. 3. The change is logged in the audit trail. 4. If the document is In Review or Approved, all active signatures are automatically revoked and the document reverts to Draft. The document must be re-approved under the new classification level. 5. Coordinate with approvers to ensure re-approval uses the correct per-class rules.
ReferencesISO 26262 Part 3, DO-178C §2.3, IEC 62304 §4.3 (as applicable)

SOP 6: GDPR Erasure Request

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for processing GDPR right-to-erasure requests for SealDoc data.
ScopeAdministrators and data protection officers.
Key steps1. Receive and validate the erasure request per your organization's GDPR process. 2. Navigate to SealDoc admin. 3. Execute the GDPR erasure function for the specified user. 4. Verify that display names have been anonymized in audit trail entries. 5. Verify that the hash chain remains intact (run chain validation). 6. Document the erasure action and its completion date.
ReferencesGDPR Art. 17

SOP 7: Incident Response (Integrity Failure)

SectionContent
PurposeDefine the procedure for responding to detected data integrity failures.
ScopeAdministrators and quality managers.
Key steps1. If chain validation fails or a hash mismatch is detected, immediately document the failure (entry ID, nature of failure, timestamp of detection). 2. Do not attempt to modify, delete, or "fix" audit trail entries. 3. Export the current audit trail as CSV for forensic preservation. 4. Notify the quality manager and begin a deviation investigation. 5. Contact SealDoc support at contact@be4.software with the failure details. 6. Assess impact: determine which signatures, approvals, or documents may be affected. 7. Document the root cause analysis, corrective actions, and preventive actions (CAPA).
References21 CFR Part 11 §11.10(e), EU Annex 11 §9, ICH Q10